Corpus · Untimely Meditations

What Makes Someone an Educator?

Essential Reading Path · Reading 6 of 10

Read: Selections from Schopenhauer as Educator, §§2–3
Allow: About 50–65 minutes, including the passages, this guide, and a short written response.

Open §2: the imagined educator

Continue to the final two paragraphs of §2

Open §3: example and independence

Read three selections in Schopenhauer as Educator, using the numbered sections in your edition. In Adrian Collins’s free translation, the headings use Roman numerals.

1. §2, first paragraph: begin at “In order to describe properly” and stop after “the discovery of its paraphysical laws.” The section starts on page 108; the paragraph continues through page 110.
2. §2, final two paragraphs: begin at “Schopenhauer has a second characteristic in common with Montaigne” and read to the end of the section, ending “his pupils and his sons.” The second link opens at page 116; move down to that opening sentence.
3. §3, first three paragraphs: begin at “I get profit from a philosopher” and stop after “listen to the music of Beethoven.” Stop before the paragraph beginning “So the first danger”. The section begins on page 118 and this selection ends on page 123.

In the omitted middle of §2, Nietzsche criticizes contemporary education and describes the honesty he hears in Schopenhauer’s writing, comparing him with Montaigne. The second selection resumes that comparison. We stop partway through §3 after the danger of isolation; the rest considers doubt about truth, the distance between genius and holiness, and the philosopher’s struggle with his time. These are selected passages, rather than the whole of either section.

Before you read

A teacher returns your essay with a question beside a confident sentence: “What would count against this?” You revise the argument. A month later, you find yourself asking that question before the teacher sees your work.

Something has changed in your judgment. The influence now operates when the teacher is absent. But suppose you also begin borrowing the teacher’s opinions and treating every disagreement as a sign that you have failed to understand. The same admiration could encourage examination or interrupt it.

Reading 1 introduced educators as people who help release a person’s possibilities. After our readings on history, we return to that problem with a particular example: the Schopenhauer Nietzsche encounters through books. Nietzsche admired him without meeting him. His portrait asks what a philosopher’s manner of thinking and living can make possible for a reader.

The main question: What makes an example worth learning from, and how can its authority leave room for your own judgment?

Read the selections once. Mark one sentence that seems to strengthen the learner’s independence and one that seems to put it at risk.

What to notice

1. The wish to obey. Nietzsche imagines trusting a philosopher more than himself. How does that wish sit beside the educator’s task of developing the whole person?
2. A joy that has faced difficulty. Why does he connect Schopenhauer with joy despite the seriousness of the problems his philosophy confronts? Recall his attack on Strauss’s satisfaction.
3. Independence and company. Follow the movement from a philosopher’s freedom from institutions to his need for friends. What does isolation endanger?

Close reading

The pupil’s centre and circumference

Nietzsche begins §2 by remembering a wish: a philosopher would arrive and relieve him of the burden of educating himself. The imagined authority could be obeyed without further questioning. That wish already creates friction with §1, where no one else could build the bridge of your life. §2, the imagined teacher

The proposed teacher then faces two educational aims. One develops a pupil’s strongest capacity; the other cultivates several capacities in harmony. Nietzsche’s example is the artist Cellini, whose father pressed him to study music despite his stronger direction elsewhere.

The image of a solar system brings the aims together. A central force can organize other powers without destroying them. The pupil needs both a centre and a circumference: a direction that gives activities coherence, and enough breadth for those activities to live. The educator must discover and cultivate that relation. §2, the solar system

This gives a practical question for the teacher returning your essay. Does the intervention merely produce a corrected paper, or develop a capacity that can organize later work? It also sharpens the unresolved question of authority: who decides what the pupil’s centre is?

Why a severe thinker can give joy

The final two paragraphs of §2 distinguish a thinker’s joy from a cheerful account of the world. Nietzsche presents Schopenhauer’s joy as the effect of facing difficult problems with strength. He contrasts it with the satisfaction he attributes to David Strauss, whose apparent victory depends on failing to confront the dangers. §2, two kinds of joy; discussion continues on page 117

The distinction returns us to Reading 2. Contentment with a culture and confidence earned through struggle can feel pleasant, yet have different grounds. Here an educator matters partly by communicating the courage to face something the learner would otherwise evade.

Nietzsche names honesty, joy, and consistency as the three elements of his first impression. His description is strikingly bodily: the influence passes from one living thing to another. He reports how the writing affects him before presenting a demonstration of its doctrines. §2, the three qualities; paragraph continues on page 118

The man imagined through the book

At the end of §2, Nietzsche acknowledges that he knew this educator only through his writings. He tries to see the living person behind them. At the start of §3, however, he insists that philosophy’s example must appear in conduct as well as in books. That combination matters: his demand reaches beyond the evidence of his own direct acquaintance.

He contrasts Kant’s university position with Schopenhauer’s independence from the state and society. The contrast concerns how thinking is lived and what obligations direct it. Nietzsche wants the philosopher’s freedom to acquire an outward form. His reference to Wagner offers another admired example of resistance to established demands. §3, philosophy as example; discussion continues on page 119

Read these as features of Nietzsche’s educational portrait. The passage does not supply a complete biography of either philosopher, nor does it establish Schopenhauer’s philosophical system. A person’s manner of pursuing a question and the truth of the answer remain things a reader must assess.

The costs hidden by the heroic picture

The next movement complicates the independent philosopher’s apparent strength. Nietzsche describes neglect, frustrated hopes of recognition, anxiety about property, and unsuccessful attempts to find trust. Preserving freedom has left Schopenhauer exposed. The hero of the account can suffer and need reassurance. §3, the dangers surrounding the example; discussion continues on pages 121–122

Nietzsche also attacks a complacent use of Goethe’s happiness. If an exceptional person could flourish in a society, admirers infer that anyone unhappy or isolated there must be at fault. That inference lets a culture use an admired achievement to avoid asking how it treats other people.

This connects with our previous reading on historical judgment. A celebrated life can become evidence used to protect the present from criticism. The question concerns what an example permits us to see, and what our use of it conceals.

Freedom needs relationships

Nietzsche pictures philosophy as a refuge from tyranny, then shows why retreat into an inner refuge is insufficient. The philosopher still lives among people who infer agreement from silence and conformity from ordinary gestures. His outward relations continually expose him to misunderstanding. §3, inner freedom and public misunderstanding

The proposed help is friendship: people with whom the solitary thinker can speak openly. Depriving such a person of love can intensify the very distress associated with isolation. Schopenhauer’s example therefore includes a need for conditions that let independence survive. §3, friendship and the danger of isolation

An educator could help develop that freedom by making honest disagreement possible. That application is ours, drawn from the passage’s account of trust. It offers a way to test admiration: can the relationship bear a question that the admired person would find difficult?

A difficulty

How much does an inspiring impression establish about an educator?

Nietzsche’s account makes the experience of reading Schopenhauer vivid. Honesty, consistency, and courage seem to become audible in a voice. But a writer can sound candid and be mistaken; a coherent personality can hold destructive views. The force of the encounter cannot, by itself, establish the truth of a doctrine or the worth of every part of a life.

The tension is especially sharp because Nietzsche begins with a wish to obey and ends §2 imagining pupils and sons. The language gives admiration a closeness that might help someone grow, yet can also make criticism feel like betrayal.

Separate two judgments as you reread: this example has helped me ask a better question, and this person should decide what answers I may accept. The first can give you a reason to keep learning without settling the second. Does Nietzsche provide enough room for that distinction, or must the reader insist on it?

Check your understanding

Try answering before opening each suggested response.

Writing prompt

Write 150–200 words answering: How could an educator strengthen your independence without becoming an authority you are afraid to question?

Choose a teacher, writer, or artist whose example has influenced you, or invent a specific case. Identify a capacity the example helps develop. Use the solar system image to explain how that capacity could connect with others. Then use one detail from §3 to describe a condition that would help the learner speak honestly.

Finish with a disagreement that the relationship would need to allow. A successful response uses both assigned sections, explains what the learner actually practices, and distinguishes the influence of an example from accepting all its conclusions.

Continue

Our next reading moves from the person who educates us to the conditions that make such education possible. Who should culture serve, and who bears the cost of sustaining it?

Reading 7: Who Is Culture For? →

A reading guide from Reading Nietzsche · Revised September 8, 2026.
Preferred edition: R. J. Hollingdale, edited by Daniel Breazeale. About the editions and free texts.

← Reading 5All ten readings