Reading Nietzsche

Themes · Knowledge and the Body

Perspectivism and the Will to Truth

Cluster Knowledge and the Body Writing period 1873–1888 First encounter 6 readings

If all knowing is from somewhere, by someone, in the service of something, what is left of the demand to be objective?

The best-known formulation — that there is only a perspectival seeing, only a perspectival knowing — comes near the end of the third essay of the Genealogy, in the middle of an analysis of the ascetic ideal. The placement is not incidental. Perspectivism arrives in Nietzsche's mature work as the consequence of having traced the will to truth back to its psychological and historical root, not as a free-standing theory of knowledge arrived at on its own.

The same passage that denies a view from nowhere also says that the more affects we let speak about a matter, and the more different eyes we bring to bear on it, the more complete our concept of it will be. That sentence makes trouble for the reading of Nietzsche as a relativist. Objectivity is not abolished there; it is redescribed as a discipline of using more perspectives rather than the fantasy of using none. Whether the redescription can carry the weight Nietzsche puts on it is one of the live disputes on this page rather than something it settles.

Beneath the epistemology is a further question, and it is the one that gives the theme its second half. Why have we treated truth as unconditionally worth having? What kind of creature prefers a painful truth to a useful illusion, and what has that preference cost? The answer offered in Genealogy III is that the will to truth is the ascetic ideal's latest and most respectable form — that the same impulse which produced the priest produced the scientist — and that this will, once it turns on itself, is what dissolves the ideal that produced it.

Essential first encounter

Six assignments, read in order. The sequence moves from the early unpublished experiment, to the mature question about the value of truth, to the account of why knowing is shaped by communication, and finally to the perspectivism passage and the point where the method turns on itself. Chronology matters here: the 1873 essay and the 1887 work are separated by everything in between.

  1. Earlier formulation

    On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense 1873, unpublished

    Truth as forgotten metaphor

    Mügge: On Truth and Falsity in their Ultramoral Sense.

    Question: If concepts are formed by dropping the differences between individual cases, what exactly has been lost, and to whom does it matter?

    Why it belongs: The essay describes truth as a mobile army of metaphors and metonymies, worn smooth by use until it is taken for the thing itself, and traces the obligation to be truthful to the requirements of living together. It is the earliest place the position is visible. Two cautions: Nietzsche did not publish it, so it cannot stand as a settled 1873 doctrine, and its account is considerably more sweeping than anything in the late work — the mature position is narrower and harder to dismiss.

    Read alongside: The Gay Science §354; Human, All Too Human §11.

    Online edition: Read the essay (trans. Maximilian A. Mügge) · Edition guidance.

  2. Core

    Beyond Good and Evil §§1–2

    The will to truth made a question

    Question: Nietzsche asks what in us wants truth. Why is that a different question from asking what truth is?

    Why it belongs: The book opens by turning the will to truth into a problem and asking why we would not rather have untruth, and then attacks the metaphysicians' faith in opposite values — the assumption that something valuable cannot have grown out of its opposite. Together the two sections establish the move the rest of the theme depends on: a question about the value of truth, prior to any question about its nature. Note that §2 makes the historical claim that this faith is the metaphysicians' fundamental one, which is an assertion about the tradition and not a demonstration.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §34; The Gay Science §344.

    Online edition: Part I (trans. Helen Zimmern; use Find for the section number) · Preferred edition.

  3. Core · Book V (1887)

    The Gay Science §344

    Even the sciences rest on a faith

    Kaufmann: How we, too, are still pious. Common: To what Extent even We are still Pious.

    Question: What is the difference between a conviction that science tests and a conviction science cannot test without presupposing?

    Why it belongs: Nietzsche argues that the scientific enterprise rests on a conviction that truth is needed above everything, and that this unconditional preference is a faith whose origin is religious. The move is decisive for the theme: it means that the critique of religion has not finished when God is given up, because the commitment that survives is the same one in a different costume. The section belongs to Book V, added in 1887, and is a late formulation rather than a position held throughout.

    Read alongside: Genealogy III §§24–28; Death of God.

    Online edition: §344 (trans. Thomas Common) · Preferred edition.

  4. Core · Book V (1887)

    The Gay Science §354

    Consciousness shaped by the need to communicate

    Kaufmann: On the "genius of the species." Common: The "Genius of the Species."

    Question: If conscious thought is bound to language and language to the herd, what follows about the kind of knowledge consciousness can deliver?

    Why it belongs: This is the passage that gives perspectivism a mechanism rather than leaving it a slogan. Nietzsche proposes that consciousness developed under the pressure of the need to communicate, that it is therefore tied to what is common and averageable, and that what becomes conscious is for that reason already generalized and falsified. It supplies a reason why knowing would be perspectival, and it locates the source in a social history rather than in a limitation of the individual mind. The speculative character of the account is on the surface: Nietzsche offers it as a conjecture and it should be read as one.

    Read alongside: The Gay Science §110; The herd and the last man.

    Online edition: §354 (trans. Thomas Common) · Preferred edition.

  5. Core

    On the Genealogy of Morals Essay III, §12

    Objectivity redefined as more eyes, not none

    Question: The passage rejects a knowing without interest, then immediately makes a comparative claim about completeness. How can both be held at once?

    Why it belongs: The central statement. Nietzsche attacks the ideal of a pure, will-less, painless knower, insists that there is only a perspectival seeing and knowing, and then says that bringing more affects and more different eyes to bear makes our concept of a thing more complete. The second half is what rules out reading the first as relativism, and it is regularly omitted when the passage is quoted. Read the surrounding sections too: the claim arrives inside an argument about the ascetic ideal, not in a chapter on epistemology.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §22; the note on the analytic reading.

    Online edition: Essay III §12 (trans. Horace B. Samuel; the Preface and each essay are numbered separately) · Preferred edition.

  6. Core

    On the Genealogy of Morals Essay III, §§24–28

    The will to truth turned on itself

    Question: If the will to truth is the ascetic ideal's latest form, what is the standing of the argument that says so?

    Why it belongs: The closing sections argue that science is not the opponent of the ascetic ideal but its most recent expression, since both rest on an unconditional valuation of truth; that this will to truth must now become conscious of itself as a problem; and that the ideal has survived because a meaningless suffering was unbearable, so that the human being preferred to will nothingness rather than not will. This is where the theme's two halves join, and where Nietzsche accepts that his own probity is implicated rather than exempt.

    Read alongside: The Gay Science §344; Nihilism.

    Online edition: Essay III §§24–28 (trans. Horace B. Samuel) · Preferred edition.

Fuller route: tests and complications

Continue with these five investigations after the first encounter. Each assignment below opens its explanation and reading links in the work survey. Read the assignments within a group in order; the question above them explains what the comparison is meant to test.

1. Is this relativism?

The cheapest reading of perspectivism makes every view as good as every other. Test that reading against the passages where Nietzsche ranks perspectives.

  1. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay III §12
    More eyes make a concept more complete.
  2. Beyond Good and Evil — §22
    Nature's conformity to law as itself an interpretation — followed by a concession.
  3. The Gay Science — §374
    The world become infinite again, with an explicit refusal to say more.
  4. The Gay Science — §373
    A mechanistic reading of the world called one of the stupidest.

2. Where do the categories come from?

If logic and identity are not given, they need a history. These sections offer one, and the account is more careful than the early essay's.

  1. The Gay Science — §110
    Errors that proved useful enough to be inherited.
  2. The Gay Science — §111
    The origin of the logical in a habit of treating unequal things as equal.
  3. The Gay Science — §121
    Survival as no argument for truth.
  4. Human, All Too Human — §16
    Appearance and the thing in itself, before the late formulations.

3. Language, grammar, and the subject that knows

Much of what looks like metaphysics may be an artefact of how we speak. Ask how far the diagnosis can go before it undermines its own statement.

  1. Human, All Too Human — §11
    Language treated as a science it never was.
  2. Beyond Good and Evil — §§16–17
    Immediate certainty examined; a thought comes when it wishes.
  3. Twilight of the Idols — 'Reason' in Philosophy
    Reason in language as the reason metaphysics is hard to shake.
  4. Beyond Good and Evil — §230
    The basic text of the human being, and the trouble with the image.

4. The will to truth and the ascetic ideal

The theme's second half. Follow the claim that intellectual honesty has a religious genealogy, and ask what follows for the person making the claim.

  1. The Gay Science — §344
    Science resting on a faith.
  2. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay III §§24–28
    Science as the ideal's latest form, and the will to nothingness.
  3. The Antichrist — §§50, 52, 54–55
    Conviction, theology, and the claim that great intellects are sceptical.
  4. Beyond Good and Evil — §211
    Philosophers who command and legislate, distinguished from scholars.

5. What replaces the true world?

Removing the true world was supposed to remove the apparent one with it. What is left, and is it a position or the absence of one?

  1. Twilight of the Idols — How the True World Finally Became a Fable
    Six stages, ending with the apparent world abolished too.
  2. The Gay Science — §374
    Infinite interpretations, and a refusal to rank them from outside.
  3. Untimely Meditations — II, On the Use and Disadvantage of History for Life
    An early case where truth and life are set against each other.
  4. Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks
    The pre-Socratics read as competing interpretations rather than failed physics.

Keep these distinctions in view

Perspectivism and relativism
The claim that all knowing is from somewhere is not the claim that all knowings are equal. Genealogy III §12 explicitly ranks: more eyes yield a more complete concept. Any reading that makes Nietzsche indifferent between perspectives has to explain that sentence away.
Objectivity abolished and objectivity redefined
What Nietzsche rejects is the knower without interest, standpoint or affect. What he puts in its place is a practice — assembling and disciplining perspectives. Whether that practice deserves the old word is a fair question to press.
Perspectivism as thesis and as consequence
Read on its own, the position looks like an epistemology. Read in place, it is what remains after the genealogy of the will to truth has been carried out. The second reading explains why the famous sentence sits inside an essay on asceticism.
Interpretation and arbitrary invention
That a description is an interpretation does not make it optional or unconstrained. Beyond Good and Evil §22 says as much in an aside, conceding that its own reading is also only interpretation. The concession is part of the argument, not a lapse in it.
The early essay and the late position
"On Truth and Lies" is unpublished, 1873, and far more sweeping than anything Nietzsche later released. Using it to fix the meaning of the 1887 passages reverses the chronology and flattens a real development.
Published statement and notebook slogan
The line about there being no facts, only interpretations is Will to Power §481 — a notebook entry in a posthumous compilation. Its published counterparts say something narrower. See the notebook readings.
Affect as distortion and affect as access
§12 does not treat the affects as noise to be filtered out. It treats them as what makes a perspective a perspective, so that more of them means more seeing. This is the point at which Nietzsche's epistemology and his psychology stop being separable.
The deflationary reading and the strong reading
Whether Nietzsche is a methodological pluralist about knowledge or a metaphysical anti-realist is genuinely contested, and the texts underdetermine it. The note below sets out the deflationary case; this page does not adjudicate between them.

A note on the analytic reading

Brian Leiter and Maudemarie Clark have argued for a deflated perspectivism: Nietzsche as a methodological pluralist about knowledge but not a metaphysical anti-realist. On their reading, the "no view from nowhere" claim is consistent with thinking that some perspectives are better than others by recognizable epistemic standards, and the target of Nietzsche's attack is a particular philosophical fantasy of disinterested knowing rather than the possibility of getting things right. Clark also argues that the strongest anti-realist formulations belong to the earlier work and the notebooks, and that the published late work is more restrained — a claim that can be tested directly against the chronology set out above.

The reading has the merit of taking Genealogy III §12 seriously, including the half of the sentence about more eyes yielding a more complete concept, and of explaining why Nietzsche goes on making confident claims about history and psychology rather than treating them as one interpretation among many. Its cost is that it has to do something with the passages where the language is unmistakably stronger — Beyond Good and Evil §22, The Gay Science §374, and most of the relevant notebook entries. Keep it as one of the available framings rather than as the settled one: it belongs beside the more flamboyant continental readings as a complication, and the disagreement between them is itself informative about what the texts will and will not support. Both editions named in further reading are listed there as approaches, not as endorsements.

Explore by work

Twenty-four assignments across seven published works and two early pieces, including the six starting readings. Core identifies that first encounter; development adds a mechanism or setting; complication tests an apparent answer; extension follows a related question. The survey follows publication chronology; the two 1873 pieces are marked as unpublished, and The Gay Science Book V is marked as the 1887 addition.

The early essays2 reading assignments

Two pieces from 1873, neither published by Nietzsche. They show the questions arriving early and in a more extravagant register than the late work will allow. Their unpublished status is not a technicality: he had the chance to release them and did not.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Untimely Meditations1 reading assignment

The 1874 essay on history is the first published place where Nietzsche sets the demand for truth against the requirements of living. The free edition divides the four essays across two volumes under the title Thoughts Out of Season; this one is in the volume translated by Adrian Collins.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Human, All Too Human2 reading assignments

The 1878 book applies the historical method to the apparatus of knowing itself. These sections are less quoted than the late formulations and considerably more measured.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

The Gay Science7 reading assignments

Book III (1882) supplies the naturalistic account of how the categories arose; Book V (1887) supplies the late questioning of the will to truth. The difference of five years between them is interpretively live, and the survey marks which sections belong to which.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Beyond Good and Evil7 reading assignments

Part I, "On the Prejudices of Philosophers," is the book's treatment of the theme; Parts VI and VII add the philosopher's task and the long programme. The free Zimmern edition has no per-section anchors, so links open the relevant part; use Find for the section number.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

On the Genealogy of Morals2 reading assignments

The third essay is where the theme is completed. Both assignments sit inside the analysis of the ascetic ideal, which is why this page insists that the epistemology cannot be lifted out of its setting. The Preface and each essay are numbered separately in every edition.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Twilight of the Idols2 reading assignments

The 1888 book compresses the position into two short chapters. Section numbers restart in each chapter and Ludovici's chapter titles differ from Kaufmann's. The free edition's contents list omits the "true world" chapter even though the text is present; use Find. See the edition guidance.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

The Antichrist1 reading assignment

The 1888 polemic turns the analysis of conviction against theology. The free Mencken text omits portions of §§29, 35 and 38 and the separate Law Against Christianity; see the edition guidance.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

The Will to Power: notebook readings

Seven numbered entries in three groups develop questions the published works raise. Begin with the shorter starting route below, or choose the question you want to pursue. This is the one theme on the site where the most frequently quoted formulations are unpublished ones, so the distinction matters more here than almost anywhere else.

A shorter starting route

Read these seven entries in order, then explore the topic groups for fuller explanations and related readings. The sequence is an editorial device for navigation; the notes were not arranged by Nietzsche in this or any other order.

  1. §466 — Ask why method might matter more than results.
  2. §481 — Test the formulation that is quoted more than any published passage.
  3. §556 — Follow the rejection of a thing in itself.
  4. §540 — Consider what many kinds of eyes would imply.
  5. §616 — Ask where the worth of the world is being located.
  6. §490 — Question whether one subject does the interpreting.
  7. §492 — Examine the proposal to begin from the body.
Facts, interpretations, and things in themselves3 assignments · 3 entries

The entries behind the best-known slogans. Read each against its published counterpart and note how much the published version gives up.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §466

    Method above results

    Question: Why would a procedure be a greater achievement than any finding it produces?

    Why it belongs: The entry holds that the distinguishing feature of the nineteenth century is the victory of scientific method over science itself. It shows why Nietzsche's critique of the will to truth is not an attack on inquiry: what he wants examined is the unconditional valuation of truth, not the discipline of finding things out. Useful as a corrective before reading §481.

    Read alongside: Genealogy III §§24–28; Genealogy as method.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §481

    A frequently quoted notebook line on this theme

    Question: Is the claim that no facts exist, or that facts are not available independently of interpretation?

    Why it belongs: Written against positivism, this is the source of the formulation about there being no facts, only interpretations, and of the claim that it is our needs that interpret the world. It is frequently cited on this theme and it is an unpublished note. Its published counterparts — Beyond Good and Evil §22 and Genealogy III §12 — are narrower and include concessions the note does not make, and the slogan's compactness has done real damage to the reception of the position.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §22; The Gay Science §374.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §556

    A thing in itself called absurd

    Question: If a thing is the sum of its effects on other things, what has been denied — an entity, or a way of talking?

    Why it belongs: The entry argues that a thing in itself is as absurd as a sense in itself, since a thing's properties are its effects on other things, and that removing all relations leaves nothing. It is the strongest anti-realist formulation in the compilation on this theme, and considerably more decisive than Human, All Too Human §16, where Nietzsche was content to call the thing-in-itself a matter of indifference. The distance between them is a good measure of how much the notebooks say that the published books do not.

    Read alongside: Human, All Too Human §16; the note on the analytic reading.

Back to the notebook guide · Compare the published works

Many eyes, and what they are worth2 assignments · 2 entries

If perspectives multiply, something has to be said about ranking them and about where value enters. These entries do both, more bluntly than the published work.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §540

    Many kinds of eyes, therefore many truths

    Question: Does the inference from many kinds of eyes to many truths go through, and what does "truth" have to mean if it does?

    Why it belongs: The entry moves from the observation that there are many kinds of eyes, so that there must be many kinds of truths, to the conclusion that consequently there is no truth. It is the clearest statement of the relativist reading, and it is a notebook note that draws a conclusion the published passages decline to draw — Genealogy III §12 ranks perspectives, and The Gay Science §374 explicitly refuses to decide the question. Read it as the strong form Nietzsche tried out, not as his settled result.

    Read alongside: Genealogy III §12; The Gay Science §374.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §616

    Where the worth of the world is located

    Question: If every elevation of a person brings new interpretations, is interpretation being described or recommended?

    Why it belongs: The entry holds that the worth of the world lies in our interpretations, that previous interpretations were perspective valuations serving power, and that the world as it concerns us is false and always becoming more false. It connects the epistemology to the evaluative project directly, and it makes explicit the evaluative interest that Genealogy III §12 keeps implicit. The move from describing interpretations to ranking them by the power they serve is exactly what the deflationary reading has to account for.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §211; Will to power.

Back to the notebook guide · Compare the published works

Who is doing the interpreting?2 assignments · 2 entries

Perspectivism needs a bearer of perspectives. These entries make trouble for the obvious candidate and propose a different starting point.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §490

    The subject as a plurality

    Question: If there is no single subject, what holds a perspective together?

    Why it belongs: The entry tests a plurality of interacting subjects in place of an assumed single one, with an analogy to cooperating and competing cells. It extends the perspectival claim to the knower, which is where Beyond Good and Evil §§16–17 were already pointing. The cell analogy is an exploratory hypothesis and not an established account of agency.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §§16–17; Self-overcoming.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §492

    Beginning from the body

    Question: What does beginning from the body offer that beginning from consciousness does not?

    Why it belongs: The entry proposes the body and physiology as the methodological starting point, on the grounds that they present a richer and more observable phenomenon than consciousness. It supplies the naturalistic underside of the perspectival claim and connects it to The Gay Science §354. The physiological confidence runs well ahead of what Nietzsche could have established.

    Read alongside: The Gay Science §354; Body and physiology.

Back to the notebook guide · Compare the published works

For the original notebook arrangement and manuscript references rather than the compilation's editorial numbering, consult Nietzsche Source's critical edition. Dating matters on this theme: several of the entries above belong to 1886–88 and sit alongside the published passages rather than behind them.

Related extensions: what might follow?

Choose these after the central questions, according to the direction your reading takes. They return to assignments already explained in the survey.

Connections

← All themesPsychology of morality →