Reading Nietzsche

Themes · Revaluation

Suffering, Cruelty, and the Discipline of the Higher

Cluster Revaluation Writing period 1878–1888 First encounter 6 readings

Nietzsche writes about pain in several registers at once: as a historical fact about how societies made people memorable to themselves, as a psychological fact about what human beings have enjoyed, as an interpretive problem about what suffering means, and as an evaluative claim about what a culture organized around abolishing pain has cost. These are different claims and they need different evidence.

The page is organized around keeping them apart, because most of the misreading on this subject comes from running them together. A historical account of how the capacity to make promises was produced is not an endorsement of the methods. A psychological claim that people have taken pleasure in cruelty is not a recommendation to be cruel. An argument that the ascetic priest gave suffering a meaning at great cost is not a claim that meaningless suffering would be better. And the evaluative claims — that pity is a danger, that comfort has produced a smaller kind of person — are the most contestable material on the page and are marked as such wherever they appear.

The centre of the theme is the second essay of the Genealogy, which gives the account of bad conscience: the proposal that when the instincts of an animal are prevented from discharging outward by the enclosure of society, they turn inward, and that this internalization is where the soul, and eventually guilt, came from. Read it alongside the third essay, which is a separate argument about a separate mechanism — the ascetic priest's interpretation of suffering, which supplies a culprit and so makes pain bearable by making the sufferer guilty. Nietzsche connects the two. He does not identify them, and neither should a reader.

One warning about the most quoted sentence on this subject. Beyond Good and Evil §229 says that almost everything called higher culture rests on the spiritualization and deepening of cruelty. In its chapter it is an argument about what has happened to an impulse when it is turned on the self and on one's own convictions — including the philosopher's willingness to be honest against his own preferences. Quoted alone it reads as a licence. The section is assigned here in full context for that reason.

Essential first encounter

Six assignments, read in order. The sequence puts the descriptive and historical material first and the evaluative claims last, so that the arguments can be assessed before the verdicts that are built on them. The two Genealogy essays are the centre and are assigned separately, because they analyse different mechanisms.

  1. Earlier formulation · 1881

    Daybreak §§18, 215

    Suffering undertaken on purpose, and what it buys

    Kennedy titles §215 "The Morality of Victims." The free edition is The Dawn of Day.

    Question: In both sections someone accepts suffering voluntarily. What is each of them getting in exchange, and who is meant to notice?

    Why it belongs: §18 examines voluntary suffering within the morality of custom: self-inflicted pain as a way of making an impression, of acquiring standing, and of exercising power — over spectators, over gods, over oneself. §215 turns the same analysis on enthusiastic self-sacrifice, and reads it as satisfying a drive in the person performing it rather than as the pure abnegation it presents itself as. Together they establish the method the Genealogy will use at full strength: ask what a painful practice does for whoever undertakes it. Note that both readings are hard to confirm or disconfirm from outside, and that this is a real limitation of the psychology rather than a detail.

    Read alongside: Genealogy II §§1–15; The psychology of morality.

    Online edition: Book I (trans. J. M. Kennedy; §215 is in Book III — use the contents or Find for the section numbers) · Preferred edition.

  2. Development · Book I (1882)

    The Gay Science §338

    What the person who pities is actually responding to

    Kaufmann: The will to suffer and those who feel pity.

    Question: Nietzsche says the pitying person sees only the surface of another's distress. What would it take to know whether he is right about that?

    Why it belongs: The sharpest middle-period statement of the case against pity as a moral principle. Nietzsche argues that a person's path of suffering is their own and unknown to the onlooker, that pity responds to what is visible and wants it removed, and that removing it may take with it what the sufferer's own way required. The section is important here because it is the argument, not the polemic: the later one-line attacks in Twilight and The Antichrist presuppose it. It is also where the strongest objection can be seen most clearly — the claim requires that the pitying person is systematically mistaken about what the sufferer needs, and Nietzsche offers no way of checking that from outside either.

    Read alongside: The Gay Science §13; Zarathustra II, "On the Pitying".

    Online edition: Book IV (trans. Thomas Common; opens nearby — use Find for the section number) · Preferred edition.

  3. Core

    On the Genealogy of Morals Essay II, §§1–15

    How an animal was made able to promise, and what it cost

    Free edition (Samuel): the Preface and each of the three essays are numbered separately.

    Question: Nietzsche derives guilt from debt and punishment from exchange. Which steps in the derivation are philological, which are historical, and which are conjecture?

    Why it belongs: This assigned span traces promise-making and memory through painful training, connects the vocabulary of guilt to debt and creditor–debtor relations, and examines punishment and pleasure in suffering. The racial and sexist comparisons in §7 are part of the passage's difficulty and require scrutiny, not adoption as evidence. §§12–13 distinguish the origin of a practice from its later purposes; §§14–15 question whether punishment produces guilt. Internalization is a later hypothesis, developed in §§16–18, beyond this assignment; continue with those sections in the fuller route on bad conscience. Read §§1–15 in order and ask which steps rest on evidence and which on conjecture.

    Read alongside: Genealogy III §§11–22; Master and slave morality.

    Online edition: Essay II (trans. Horace B. Samuel) · Preferred edition.

  4. Core

    On the Genealogy of Morals Essay III, §§11–22

    A meaning supplied for pain, and the price of the supply

    Question: The priest changes the direction of resentment rather than removing the suffering. Why does Nietzsche treat that as a genuine achievement?

    Why it belongs: A separate mechanism from the one in Essay II, and it needs to be read as separate. Nietzsche describes the ascetic priest as the physician of a sick herd who cannot cure the sickness but can make it endurable: by changing the direction of resentment, by prescribing regimens and small joys and mechanical activity, and above all by giving the sufferer a culprit — himself. What was unbearable was never pain as such but pain without meaning, and the priestly interpretation supplies one. Nietzsche's tone here is worth attending to: he calls the priest's work a triumph and treats him as the genuine saviour of the herd, while arguing that the cure deepened the illness. The mixture of admiration and diagnosis is not a lapse.

    Read alongside: Genealogy III §28; Critique of Christianity.

    Online edition: Essay III §§11 onwards (trans. Horace B. Samuel) · Preferred edition.

  5. Complication

    Beyond Good and Evil §§225, 229, 270

    The evaluative claims, stated at full strength

    §§225 and 229 are in Part VII, "Our Virtues"; §270 is in Part IX, "What Is Noble?" Section numbers run continuously across the book's nine parts.

    Question: §229 says the cruelty has been refined rather than abolished. Is that a claim about what people do, or about how to describe what they do?

    Why it belongs: These are the evaluative sections, and they are the ones this page treats as most contestable. §225 sets happiness against greatness and argues that what has made the human being deep is precisely what a morality organized around abolishing suffering would remove. §229 argues that cruelty has not disappeared from higher culture but been turned inward and refined, and includes the seeker after knowledge who forces his spirit to recognize what he would rather not — a reading that makes intellectual honesty itself a case of cruelty. §270 observes that deep suffering separates people and that cheerfulness can be a mask. Read them together and read the surrounding sections. Then notice what is not established: that the refinement of cruelty was necessary, that no other route to depth exists, or that a culture should therefore preserve the conditions that produced it. Nietzsche asserts these; the sections argue for none of them.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §188; Amor fati.

    Online edition: Part VII (trans. Helen Zimmern; §270 is in Part IX — use Find for the section numbers) · Preferred edition.

  6. Complication · 1888

    Twilight of the Idols "Skirmishes of an Untimely Man" §38; "Morality as Anti-Nature" §3

    The late compressions, and what compression costs

    Ludovici: "Skirmishes in a War with the Age" and "Morality as the Enemy of Nature." Section numbers restart in each chapter.

    Question: Both sections state in a paragraph what earlier books argued over many pages. What is lost in the compression, and is anything gained?

    Why it belongs: "Skirmishes" §38 is the late statement of the political and cultural version of the claim: Nietzsche's conception of freedom as something measured by the resistance overcome and by what it costs, against the modern institutions he thinks have made people comfortable and small. "Morality as Anti-Nature" §3 argues that a morality which attacks the passions at their root, because it cannot discipline them, is the response of organisms too weak for moderation. Both are worth reading as the late voice at its most quotable and its least argued. The instruction this page gives for them is the one it gives for all the evaluative material: read what the earlier books actually establish, then read these, and keep the difference in view.

    Read alongside: Twilight, "The 'Improvers' of Mankind"; The herd and the last man.

    Online edition: "Skirmishes" §38 (trans. Anthony M. Ludovici; for "Morality as the Enemy of Nature" use the contents) · Preferred edition.

Five claims, kept apart

The single most useful thing a reader can do with this material is to keep track of which claim is being made. Nietzsche moves between them quickly and the transitions are often unmarked.

1. Suffering as discipline (a claim about what produced something)
That the capacity to make promises, to sustain a long project, to keep a commitment across time, was produced by harsh training and is not natural to the animal. The evidence is historical and philological, and the argument is in Genealogy II §§1–3.
2. Cruelty as psychology (a claim about what people have enjoyed)
That watching and inflicting suffering has been a source of pleasure, that this is not an aberration, and that the pleasure did not disappear but changed form. Genealogy II §§5–7 and Beyond Good and Evil §229. This is descriptive, and it is the claim most often quoted as if it were a recommendation.
3. Bad conscience (a claim about a mechanism)
That instincts prevented from discharging outward turn inward, and that this internalization is the origin of inner depth and eventually of guilt. Genealogy II §§16–18. Note that Nietzsche gives bad conscience an origin in the enclosure of society, before and independently of the slave revolt; the two are connected later, not identified.
4. The ascetic interpretation (a claim about meaning)
That the priest made suffering bearable by giving it a cause in the sufferer's own guilt, and that this interpretation succeeded because meaningless suffering was the real problem. Genealogy III §§11–22 and §28. This is an interpretive-historical claim about an institution, distinct from all three above.
5. The evaluative claims (what Nietzsche wants said about all this)
That pity elevated to a principle is a danger; that a culture organized around the abolition of pain produces a diminished kind of person; that what is valuable in human beings was bought at a price a modern reader would refuse to pay. Beyond Good and Evil §225, Twilight, The Antichrist §7. These do not follow from claims 1–4. Someone could accept every descriptive claim on this page and reject every evaluative one.

Two things that are not on the list, because Nietzsche does not argue for them. He does not argue that suffering is good for people in general, or that an individual should seek out pain; the disciplinary claim is about what has historically produced certain capacities, not a prescription for a life. And he does not argue that one should be cruel to others: the passages about the refinement of cruelty are about what has happened to an impulse, and the ones he most admires are about what a person does to their own convictions. Reading the first four claims as advice is the standard way this theme goes wrong, and it goes wrong in a direction the texts do not support.

Fuller route: tests and complications

Five investigations, one for each of the claims above. Each assignment opens its full explanation and reading links in the work survey below. Read the assignments within a group in order.

1. Discipline: what was produced, and how

Follow the claim that certain capacities were made rather than given, and ask at each step what would count as evidence.

  1. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay II §§1–3
    Breeding an animal with the right to make promises; memory burned in with pain.
  2. Beyond Good and Evil — §188
    The long constraint that Nietzsche says produced everything free on earth, stated as a general thesis.
  3. Twilight of the Idols — "The 'Improvers' of Mankind"
    The same claim turned against moral improvement: taming described as weakening.
  4. Human, All Too Human — §107
    The naturalist argument pushed to complete irresponsibility, and Nietzsche calling the conclusion bitter.

2. Cruelty as a psychological fact

The descriptive claim, and the places where it is most likely to be misread as something else.

  1. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay II §§5–7
    Festival cruelty, and the argument that the sight of suffering was once simply enjoyed.
  2. Beyond Good and Evil — §229
    The refinement of cruelty, including the knower's cruelty toward his own preferences.
  3. Human, All Too Human — §99
    Separating what is done from the evaluation attached to it, as a method rather than a verdict.
  4. Homer's Contest
    An institution described as channelling destructive energy rather than removing it.

3. Bad conscience: the mechanism

The most consequential single piece of moral psychology in the corpus. Test whether the account can stand on its own.

  1. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay II §§16–18
    Instincts turned inward under enclosure; the soul as the space that opens.
  2. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay II §§19–22
    Debt to ancestors becoming debt to a god, and guilt made irredeemable.
  3. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay II §§24–25
    The passage where Nietzsche imagines redemption from it — and then breaks off.
  4. Thus Spoke Zarathustra — I, "On the Pale Criminal"
    The same mechanism dramatized, and the deed misread by the doer.

4. The ascetic interpretation of suffering

A separate argument with a separate object. Follow the priest's solution and then the cost Nietzsche says it carried.

  1. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay III §§11–22
    The physician who changes the direction of resentment and supplies a culprit.
  2. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay III §28
    Meaningless suffering named as the real problem, and the will to nothingness as the solution.
  3. The Antichrist — §22
    The same analysis applied to a specific institution's organization of guilt.
  4. On the Genealogy of Morals — Essay III §§1–5
    The ascetic ideal outside religion, in artists and elsewhere, before the priestly case.

5. The evaluative claims, examined

The contestable material. Read the strongest statements and then ask what in the earlier essays actually supports them.

  1. Beyond Good and Evil — §225
    Happiness against greatness, and pity for the creature set against pity for the creator.
  2. The Gay Science — §338
    The argued version, on which the later one-line attacks depend.
  3. The Antichrist — §7
    Pity called the practice of nihilism: the claim at its most compressed and least defended.
  4. Thus Spoke Zarathustra — II, "On the Pitying"
    The dramatic version, and the complication Part IV adds to it.

Keep these distinctions in view

Bad conscience and the slave revolt
The first essay describes a revaluation carried out by the powerless; the second describes instincts turning inward under social enclosure. Nietzsche gives them different origins and different mechanisms. Keep three further steps distinct: internalization in II §§16–18, the development and moralization of religious debt in II §§19–22, and the ascetic priest's redirection of suffering toward guilt in III §§15 and 20. Their relations need to be traced; the slave revolt is not a single explanation for all of them.
Pain and meaningless pain
Genealogy III §28 is explicit that what the human being objected to was not suffering but suffering without a reason. Every part of the theme depends on this: the priest's success, the ascetic ideal's durability, and whatever Nietzsche thinks might replace them.
Describing an enjoyment and endorsing it
The claim that watching suffering has been pleasurable is a claim about human beings, offered with historical examples. Nietzsche thinks the denial of it is dishonest. Neither the claim nor the charge of dishonesty tells anyone to do anything.
Cruelty toward others and cruelty toward oneself
Beyond Good and Evil §229 includes cruelty turned inward through asceticism and the discipline of knowing, as well as pleasure in others' suffering. That distinction does not confine Nietzsche's approvals to self-discipline: §§257–259 make harsh claims about hierarchy, exploitation, and the costs imposed on others. Ask in each passage whether he is describing a practice, valuing it, or defending it.
Pity as a feeling and pity as a principle
The target is the elevation of pity to the highest moral value, a position Nietzsche associates with Schopenhauer and with the moral culture of his century. Passages attacking that principle are not straightforwardly advice about how to treat a particular person in distress, and reading them that way makes the argument both stupider and easier to dismiss.
Suffering as condition and suffering as recommendation
That depth was historically produced by hardship does not by itself show that an individual should seek it. Yet the published work also makes evaluative demands: Beyond Good and Evil §225 opposes the abolition of suffering and calls for its increase in connection with higher possibilities. Read the demand alongside the historical account, without turning either into a universal prescription. See the notebook readings.
Nietzsche's explanation and Nietzsche's verdict
The Genealogy gives an account of how the moral world was made and then passes judgment on it. The account could be right and the judgment wrong, or the reverse. The page keeps the two apart wherever they appear in the same section, because in the strongest passages they arrive in the same sentence.

Explore by work

Twenty-six assignments across nine published works and one early unpublished essay, including the six starting readings. Core identifies the first encounter; development adds a mechanism or setting; complication tests an apparent answer; extension follows a related question. The survey follows publication chronology, and the 1872 essay is marked as unpublished.

The early work2 reading assignments

Two texts from 1872: the first published book, and a short piece Nietzsche did not publish. Both concern how Greek culture handled what it did not deny. The free Birth of Tragedy is translated by William A. Haussmann; "Homer's Contest" is in a different volume, translated by Maximilian A. Mügge.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Human, All Too Human2 reading assignments

The 1878 book's second chapter, "On the History of the Moral Sensations," is where the apparatus the Genealogy will use at full strength is first assembled. The tone is analytic and the conclusions are more tentative. Preferred edition: Hollingdale.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Daybreak2 reading assignments

The 1881 book, and the most patient treatment of this material in the corpus. Preferred translation: Hollingdale; the free edition is The Dawn of Day, translated by J. M. Kennedy.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

The Gay Science2 reading assignments

The sharpest middle-period statements on pity, and the place where the argument against it is actually made rather than asserted.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Thus Spoke Zarathustra3 reading assignments

The dramatic version. Zarathustra is most useful here for the two places where it makes the position harder rather than clearer: the speech against pity, and the ending in which Zarathustra's own pity is the last thing he has to overcome.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Beyond Good and Evil4 reading assignments

The evaluative statements, and the general thesis about constraint that they rest on. Section numbers run continuously from 1 to 296 across the book's nine parts.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

On the Genealogy of Morals7 reading assignments

The theme's centre. Read the second essay for the mechanism and the third for the interpretation; they are separate arguments and the page treats them that way. The free edition numbers the Preface and each essay separately, and includes Nietzsche's closing Note after Essay I §17.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

Twilight of the Idols2 reading assignments

The late compressions. Section numbers restart in each chapter, and several chapter titles differ in the free edition.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

The Antichrist2 reading assignments

The polemic at full intensity. The free translation is by H. L. Mencken; the course follows Kaufmann. The wider argument about Christianity belongs to the critique of Christianity page; only the claims about suffering and pity are taken here.

Back to the work list · Return to the fuller route

The Will to Power: notebook readings

Seven numbered entries in three groups. The notebooks return to this material repeatedly, and on two points they go further than anything Nietzsche published: they state the evaluative claims more baldly, and they come closer than the books do to recommending hardship rather than explaining it. Both are reasons to read them carefully, and reasons not to let them stand in for the published arguments.

A shorter starting route

Read these seven entries in order, then explore the groups below for fuller explanations and related readings. The sequence is an editorial device for navigation; the notes were not arranged by Nietzsche in this or any other order.

  1. §294 — Begin where self-accusation is treated as a reversal rather than a discovery.
  2. §376 — Follow aggression that has nowhere to go.
  3. §738 — Ask what punishment is supposed to accomplish.
  4. §366 — Test the dispute about pity in its notebook form.
  5. §983 — Consider whether strength and pity are actually opposed.
  6. §1052 — Compare two ways of reading the same suffering.
  7. §1041 — Ask what affirming the difficult would have to involve.
Cruelty with nowhere to go3 assignments · 3 entries

The notebook versions of the bad-conscience argument, and of the account of punishment that goes with it. Read each against Genealogy II, which is more careful.

  • Notebook reading · Book II

    The Will to Power §294

    Conscience, self-accusation, and a reversal of guilt

    Question: If the feeling of conscience is a reversal of an earlier direction, what was it pointing at first?

    Why it belongs: The entry treats the experience of conscience and self-accusation as the turning-around of something that was once directed outward, rather than as the perception of a fault. It is the notebook form of the claim Genealogy II §§16–18 makes at length, and reading it first makes the published version's care visible: the essay builds a historical setting for the reversal, while the note simply asserts it.

    Read alongside: Genealogy II §§16–18; The psychology of morality.

  • Notebook reading · Book II

    The Will to Power §376

    When blocked aggression turns inward

    Question: Does the account require that the quantity of aggression be conserved? Is that assumption doing work?

    Why it belongs: The entry describes what happens to an impulse that cannot be discharged outward and has to be spent on its possessor instead. It is the mechanism in its barest form, and the bareness exposes the assumption the published essay half-conceals: that the drive persists undiminished and must go somewhere. That is a piece of nineteenth-century psychological physics, and it is worth asking how much of the Genealogy depends on it.

    Read alongside: Genealogy II §§16–18; Body and physiology.

  • Notebook reading · Book III

    The Will to Power §738

    Punishment, shame, and the possibility of return

    Question: If punishment marks a person permanently, what has the community actually decided?

    Why it belongs: The entry considers what punishment does beyond whatever it is supposed to achieve — the shame it attaches, and whether the punished person can be received back. It extends Genealogy II §§12–15 into a practical question the essay raises and does not answer, and it is the notebook material closest to a constructive proposal on this theme. The submitted essay Justice Without Revenge? takes up the same question at length.

    Read alongside: Zarathustra I, "On the Pale Criminal"; Master and slave morality.

Back to the notebook guide · Compare the published works

The dispute about pity2 assignments · 2 entries

Two entries that complicate the polemic, including one that makes a concession the published attacks do not.

  • Notebook reading · Book II

    The Will to Power §366

    The dispute over pity

    Question: Which of the several objections to pity in the corpus does this entry actually make?

    Why it belongs: The entry sets out the disagreement about pity as a disagreement rather than a verdict, which is useful because the published late work rarely does. Read it as a map of the positions Nietzsche is moving between — pity as weakness, as an exercise of power, as an insult to the sufferer, as a genuine danger to the one who feels it — and then check which of them The Antichrist §7 is relying on.

    Read alongside: The Gay Science §338; The Antichrist §7.

  • Notebook reading · Book IV

    The Will to Power §983

    Commanding strength and the capacity for pity

    Question: If strength can afford pity, is pity still the target — or only pity in the weak?

    Why it belongs: The entry associates commanding strength with a capacity for pity rather than with its absence, which cuts directly against the flattest reading of the published polemic. It does not withdraw the attack; it relocates it, so that what is objectionable is pity in someone who cannot afford it. Whether that distinction can be made to hold — and whether it is anything more than a way of exempting the people Nietzsche approves of — is the useful question to take away.

    Read alongside: Beyond Good and Evil §270; Master and slave morality.

Back to the notebook guide · Compare the published works

What suffering is worth2 assignments · 2 entries

The two entries where the evaluative question is put most directly, and where the distance between explanation and recommendation is narrowest.

  • Notebook reading · Book IV

    The Will to Power §1052

    Two meanings of suffering

    Question: The same suffering is read two ways. Is the difference in the suffering, in the sufferer, or only in the interpretation?

    Why it belongs: The entry contrasts suffering taken as an objection to existence with suffering taken as belonging to it, using the figures of the crucified and of Dionysus. It states the alternative that Genealogy III §28 sets up, and it states it as a choice between interpretations rather than as a discovery about pain. Read it with the published essay to see what the books supply that the note does not: an account of why one interpretation prevailed.

    Read alongside: Genealogy III §28; Critique of Christianity.

  • Notebook reading · Book IV

    The Will to Power §1041

    Affirming the difficult features of existence

    Question: What would distinguish affirming what is questionable and terrible from simply enduring it?

    Why it belongs: The entry describes the affirmative position as one that says yes to what is questionable and terrible in existence rather than in spite of it. It is the closest the notebooks come to turning the analysis of suffering into a task, and it is where this theme hands over to amor fati. It is also where the risk on this page is highest: read carelessly, the entry becomes the advice that suffering is good for you, which is not what it says and not what any published passage says.

    Read alongside: Amor fati; Nihilism.

Back to the notebook guide · Compare the published works

For the original notebook arrangement and manuscript references rather than the compilation's editorial numbering, consult Nietzsche Source's critical edition. The compilation's Book II and Book IV groupings are the editors' arrangement, and the order in which these entries appear carries no argument.

A reader essay bearing on this theme. Submissions are independent pieces of writing, not part of the editorial passage selections above.

Related extensions: what might follow?

Choose these after the central questions, according to the direction your reading takes. They return to assignments already explained in the survey.

Connections

← Herd and last manAll themes →