Themes · Revaluation

The Herd and the Last Man

The "last man" is the figure who has heard the news that God is dead and has settled for comfort. He blinks. He invents little pleasures for the day and little pleasures for the night. He has discovered happiness — a small, flat, manageable happiness — and he wants no more.

The diagnosis is cultural before it is moral. Nietzsche sees the democratic, levelling, bureaucratized European modernity of the late nineteenth century as a culture optimized to produce this type — risk- averse, peace-loving, comfortably skeptical, congratulating itself on its enlightenment. What the diagnosis does not license is the elite contempt that some of his readers (and some of his appropriators) have wanted to draw from it. Nietzsche's complaint is not that ordinary people exist; it is that a culture has stopped being able to produce anything but ordinary people, and has begun to call that achievement.

Read carefully alongside the master/slave material, the herd is the social form of slave morality once it has triumphed and become so widely shared that it no longer recognizes itself as a particular valuation. Once everyone is "good," the question of what greatness might be can no longer be asked.

Reading path

The dramatic statement first, then the analytical version, then the late polemical extensions. Zarathustra's marketplace and Beyond Good and Evil's herd morality are the same diagnosis in different keys.

1. Thus Spoke Zarathustra Prologue §3–5

   The marketplace scene. Zarathustra announces the overman; the crowd asks for the last man; he obliges, and they applaud. "We have invented happiness — say the last men — and they blink." One of the great satirical passages in modern philosophy.

2. Beyond Good and Evil §201–203

   The analytical version. The herd morality that has come to dominate Europe; the danger that "no shepherd and one herd" could be the destination of universal democratic progress; the call for new philosophers who can think against the current.

3. Twilight of the Idols "Skirmishes" §37–38; "What the Germans Lack" §1–7

   The late cultural diagnosis. Modern democratic culture as a culture of decadence — not because democratic, but because levelling; the German educational system as a machine for producing competent mediocrity.

4. The Gay Science §116, §117

   "Herd-instinct" and "Herd-conscience." Two short sections from the middle period that show the apparatus already in place. Worth reading to see how long Nietzsche has been working this material before Zarathustra.

Across the corpus

The herd is one of the late corpus's most widely distributed themes. The marketplace scene is its dramatic centerpiece, but the diagnosis runs from the middle works (where the apparatus — morality of fear, herd-conscience, the social construction of consciousness — is built) through the late polemics on democratic modernity, the egalitarian inheritance of Christianity, and the priestly economy that produced both. When the technical vocabulary is absent, look for "common," "average," "modern," equality, pity, the morality of fear, the "improvement" of humanity, and the long levelling of European culture.

Human, All Too Human

The middle period's first sustained look at the social form of morality. Human, All Too Human does not yet have the vocabulary of "the herd," but it already practices the analysis — the press, the public, the institutions of nineteenth-century European life read as the conditions under which a particular type of human being is being produced.

• §472 — religion and government. The functional role of religion as social cement, kept "useful" once metaphysical belief weakens.
• §224 — ennobling through degeneration. A characteristic middle-period observation: that what looks like cultural exhaustion is sometimes the condition of a new beginning.
• "Mixed Opinions and Maxims" §304–§318 — the press, public opinion, and the modern audience. The mass-cultural infrastructure on which the herd depends.
• "The Wanderer and His Shadow" §289 — the convalescent's solitude. The countertype implicit: thinking against the prevailing current.

Daybreak

Where the technical apparatus actually crystallizes. Two contributions matter most: the analysis of "morality of custom" (the social mechanism by which a herd reproduces its valuations) and "morality of fear" (the affective basis on which herd morality holds together once custom no longer suffices). Read these alongside BGE Part V; they are the same diagnosis at an earlier stage of articulation.

• §9 — morality as obedience to custom. The most patient single statement of how a herd morality reproduces itself.
• §104 — custom morality and the individual deviation that registers as guilt.
• §174 — the morality of timidity. An early formulation of what BGE §201 will name "morality of fear."
• §206 — preachers of equality, seen psychologically. The proto-version of the Zarathustra tarantulas chapter.

The Gay Science — beyond §116, §117

The middle period at its sharpest on this theme. §116 and §117 on the spine are the named-and-numbered statement of the herd apparatus; the surrounding aphorisms develop the analysis — most importantly §354, where Nietzsche makes the unusual claim that consciousness itself is herd-shaped, an instrument that developed for communication and therefore bears the print of the social. That is the deepest statement in the corpus of the herd's reach.

• §1 — the teachers of the purpose of existence; humanity's submission to whatever purpose has been declared. The herd's metaphysical hunger.
• §50 — "the argument of the increasing solitude." A note on what it costs to think against the prevailing current.
• §188 — modern restlessness; the noise of a culture that does not know how to be alone with itself.
• §283 — "preparatory human beings." The countertype: those who live in advance of the herd they cannot yet leave.
• §354 — "On the genius of the species." The deep claim: consciousness as a herd-developed instrument; the modern subject's interiority as itself a social product. Read this carefully — it is a more radical naturalism than most of the late polemic.
• §377 — "We who are homeless." The closing self-portrait of the late Gay Science: the type who can no longer belong to any of the modern Europes, including the democratic-progressive one.

Thus Spoke Zarathustra — beyond Prologue §3–5

The marketplace scene is the dramatic centerpiece, on the spine. The Prologue's countertype, the overman, is set against the last man with a directness Nietzsche does not equal in the later books. Around the marketplace scene, several speeches extend the diagnosis — most importantly "On the Flies of the Marketplace," which gives the most concentrated psychological portrait of the public sphere in the corpus.

• Part I, "On the Three Metamorphoses" — camel, lion, child. The figures of progressive overcoming of the herd: the dutiful spirit, the rebellious spirit, the creative spirit.
• Part I, "On the Flies of the Marketplace" — "Flee, my friend, into your solitude!" The most concentrated Z passage on the public, the celebrity-and-attention economy of late modernity, and what it does to anyone trying to think.
• Part I, "On the New Idol" — the modern state read as a herd-machine; the most political single passage in the late corpus.
• Part II, "On the Tarantulas" — equality-preachers as disguised revenge. (Cited on master/slave; here as the herd's political face.)
• Part III, "On Old and New Tablets" §3, §13 — the old tablets of obedience set against the new tablets of self-legislation.
• Part IV, "The Awakening" and "The Ass Festival" — the higher men, gathered in Zarathustra's cave, fall back into the herd's habits. The late poetic treatment of how persistent the gravitational pull of the herd is, even on those who have rejected it.

Beyond Good and Evil — beyond §201–203

The mature analytical statement. Part V, "The Natural History of Morals" (§186–§203), is on the spine; the surrounding parts extend the diagnosis to politics, religion, gender, and European culture writ large. BGE is also the place where Nietzsche makes the historical claim that most directly locates the modern herd: that the democratic movement is the inheritor of the Christian movement, and that the leveling Europe of his moment is a stage in a long process that began long before democracy was named.

• §62 — religion as a means of preserving and elevating the species; the long survey of how a herd-religion sustains a herd.
• §188 — the long unfreedom of the spirit. (Cited on genealogy method; here as the ironic claim that the modern herd's freedoms are the product of a long discipline of constraint.)
• §199 — herd obedience as the long European inheritance.
• §242 — "the democratic movement is the heir of the Christian movement." Probably the single most important BGE passage for this theme: the structural-genealogical claim that the herd of modern Europe is the long product of the Christian inheritance, secularized.
• §253 — the prejudice that holds Europe in place. (Also on revaluation.)
• §262 — "a species comes to be… in long protracted struggle with essentially constant unfavorable conditions." The claim that the modern herd's comfort is precisely what is undoing the conditions of any higher type. One of the late corpus's most-cited single passages.
• §268 — common words and rare experiences; how language itself works for the average.

On the Genealogy of Morals

The herd appears here under a different vocabulary — not as a sociology but as the object of priestly care. Essay III is the most concentrated treatment: the ascetic priest as the shepherd of the sick herd, organizing the suffering of the weak so that the herd does not destroy itself. The political claim about modern democratic culture is then the secularization of this priestly function.

• Preface §6 — "the danger of dangers": that the herd's morality should become unconditional and silence the question of higher possibilities.
• Essay I §11 — the lower types praised as good. The point at which slave morality becomes a herd morality.
• Essay III §13–§16 — the ascetic priest as the shepherd of the sick herd. Probably the most analytically careful treatment of the social function of herd-morality in the corpus.
• Essay III §18–§19 — the priest's "remedies"; the herd organized so that the weak do not destroy the strong.

Twilight of the Idols — beyond "Skirmishes" §37–38; "What the Germans Lack"

The late polemic on modern culture moves at full speed in Twilight. The spine takes the central chapters; the rest of "Skirmishes" walks the diagnosis through specific modern phenomena — art, education, freedom, equality, the problem of the artist in a democratic culture.

• "The 'Improvers' of Mankind" — what it means, in cultural-physiological terms, to "improve" a human being morally. (Also on revaluation and genealogy method.)
• "Skirmishes" §32–§35 — modern art, modern morality, the levelling of taste.
• "Skirmishes" §39–§44 — the sustained critique of the modern democratic ideal: equality, progress, the working class, the institution of marriage, the modern conception of freedom. The late polemic at full pitch — read for the diagnosis, not for the prescriptions.
• "Skirmishes" §48–§49 — the late contrast with Goethe as the figure of a non-decadent modernity; the type the herd has not produced.

The Antichrist

Christianity read as the institutional source of the modern herd. The page on critique of Christianity takes the central polemic; what matters here is Nietzsche's specific argument that the metaphysical core of egalitarianism — the equality of souls before God — is what has produced the political egalitarianism that calls itself secular.

• §3–§7 — pity as the practice of nihilism; the religion of the weak protecting itself.
• §43 — "the doctrine of equality of souls before God" as the metaphysical core of egalitarian morality. The most concentrated genealogical claim about modern democratic ideology in the corpus.
• §57 — Manu and the comparative method; the contrast with a non-egalitarian moral legislation. (Also on revaluation and genealogy method.)

Ecce Homo

The retrospective. Ecce Homo's relation to the herd is mostly a relation to its readership — Nietzsche's late, half-comic worry that he would be read by the wrong type, and his sharp insistence on the rare reader the books were actually written for.

• "Why I Write Such Good Books" §1 — "Some are born posthumously." The audience problem: a book against the herd cannot hope to be popular among the herd, and should not want to be.
• "Why I Write Such Good Books" §3 — the rare reader specified: who Nietzsche is writing for, and who he is not.
• on The Case of Wagner — Wagner as the symptom of the herd's relation to art: the theatrical, the affecting, the manipulable.

The Case of Wagner

The late little book on Wagner is, beneath the surface, a book on the herd. Wagner is the herd's modern artist — the producer of large effects, the manipulator of mass emotion, the theatrical priest of a culture that has lost its capacity for austerity. Read it short and brisk; it is one of Nietzsche's most readable late works.

• Preface; §5–§7 — the diagnosis of Wagner as decadence: the artist who flatters, who overwhelms, who produces effects rather than form.
• §11 — the actor and the herd; Wagner's relation to his audience as the late nineteenth century's relation to itself.

The Nachlass and the so-called Will to Power

Standard caveat: the notebooks are working notes, not a book Nietzsche wrote, and the compilation that circulates as The Will to Power was assembled posthumously with significant editorial intervention. For the herd theme, the relevant notebook material is the late "European nihilism" notes — the most extended technical discussion in the corpus of decadence, leveling, and the modern type.

• WP Book One (§22–§23, §38–§77) — "European Nihilism" and the typology of the modern type. The most extended single discussion of decadence as a cultural-historical phenomenon. Cross-reference against the published Antichrist §6–§7 and Twilight "Skirmishes" before drawing conclusions.
• WP Book Three (§862–§875) — "Order of Rank" notes. Use with strong caution: these are the notes most distorted by the editorial framing of the posthumous compilation, and are routinely misread.

Expanded reading path

A sequence that traces the diagnosis across the whole corpus rather than concentrating on the marketplace scene. It moves from the middle-period apparatus through Zarathustra's dramatic statement to the mature analytical version and the late polemics, and ends at Ecce Homo's acid remarks about who the books were written for.

1. Daybreak §9, §174, §206

   Morality of custom, morality of timidity, the early portrait of preachers of equality. The middle-period apparatus.

2. The Gay Science §354, §377

   Consciousness as a herd instrument; the homelessness of the type that can no longer belong to any modern Europe.

3. Thus Spoke Zarathustra Prologue §5; "On the Flies of the Marketplace"; "On the New Idol"

   The dramatic centerpiece; the public-sphere diagnosis; the modern state as herd-machine.

4. Beyond Good and Evil §202, §242, §262

   Herd morality named; democracy as the heir of Christianity; the comfort that is undoing the conditions of any higher type.

5. On the Genealogy of Morals III §13–§16

   The ascetic priest as shepherd of the sick herd. The most analytically careful single treatment of herd-morality's social function.

6. Twilight of the Idols "Skirmishes" §39–§44

   The sustained late polemic on equality, progress, freedom, and the modern democratic ideal.

7. The Antichrist §43

   The doctrine of equality of souls as the metaphysical core of secular egalitarianism.

8. Ecce Homo "Why I Write Such Good Books" §1, §3

   The audience problem: who the books were written for, and who not.

The arc reads: in Daybreak Nietzsche learns the apparatus (custom, fear, equality-preaching); in The Gay Science he extends it to consciousness itself; in Zarathustra he stages the marketplace scene that becomes the theme's emblem; in Beyond Good and Evil he gives the genealogical claim about democracy as the heir of Christianity; in the Genealogy he locates the priestly economy that produced both; in Twilight and The Antichrist he runs the late polemic at full intensity; in Ecce Homo he closes with an honest word about what kind of reader a book against the herd can expect to find.

Submissions

Reader essays on this theme. Submissions are independent pieces of writing, not part of the editorial reading paths above.

None yet.

Connections

• The death of God The last man is the figure who has heard the news and registered nothing.
• Overman The opposing figure to the last man — the alternative the marketplace refuses.
• Master and slave morality The herd is slave morality become a culture.
• Nihilism Passive nihilism in its socially comfortable form.
• Free spirits The countertype: those who think against the herd because they cannot do otherwise.
• Women, marriage, and gender Nietzsche's hostility to the women's emancipation movement partly tracks his hostility to leveling.

← Genealogy as method Suffering and cruelty →